Well, I’m officially neither far-right nor far-left, in Australian politics I’m officially a swinging voter. Having voted at one point or another for both parties. As for American politics, a prudent Australian individual would take notice, because as you say, what happens there, comes here! I am not a “Trumper” but at present he’s the only pick. I like RFK Jr, but in the end he’ll be a disruptive third. Good on him! Oh, for the record, the Labor Party, has by stealth allowed proportionately into Australia similars ‘legal’ immigrate levels as Biden has let ‘slipped’ across the border into the US. It’s a disgrace for us and them.
Indeed, Kennedy is great on many things I value, and very much stronger than Trump on all the toxic products, but without preferential voting... I don't know how much he'll be an alternative for the Democrat voters. I very much hope he can find his way into the Trump administration somewhere useful and powerful.
I prefer Trump's policies also...as any remotely sane person would. Unfortunately I don't see a miracle, I see a set up. Immediately the documents case is dropped, a questionable VP is announced, and a random vaxxine conversation is leaked. He recounts that 'there was blood all over my hand', except there wasn't, at all. I don't know what to think, or what the whole truth is, but I'm fairly certain it is not the narrative being enthusiastically sold by Tucker, Candace, Naomi, Megyn, Piers, Shapiro, Brand, and well,...almost everyone, including people who previously hated DT. I have a really bad feeling about this, and hope I'm absolutely wrong.
He's exaggerated about the blood all over his hand, but the photo at 1:01 in this vid certainly shows it - it's shaped like the touch on an ear rim - and if you look in the standard vids, immediately after the touch he wipes his thumb against his finger to clean the blood off. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYZkuishR6c I'm not saying a photo can't be touched up.
Nor saying that he didn't break a fake capsule and find the feel of the substance distasteful. I've put the photo into the article.
I've also put in another photo of his closest agent with a bloodied cloth - I've seen images of the agent wiping his face.
I've been through a few 'it was a set up' vids, and I can't explain everything, but I've come down on the balance of probabilities - watching him flinch - that he was hit.
I'm very glad you're cynical and I'll go through the bitchute in the morning - I'd love to discuss it all too.
So... I've spent a lot of time looking at the video at the link you gave me, and many, many others. I am no expert on guns and recoil. The narrator of the video seemed to suggest that every time the SS gun moved (in that first team) a shot had been fired. If that were the case I'd expect three Very off-target shots (unless the gun had some programmable firing point because it was moving around everywhere.
The narrator's argument relied on the synchronisation of the gun movement and the sound. As that is something that can be readily manipulated in post production I checked a lot of other videos, often side-by-side. I saw another synchronised like that at your link above, and an alternate timing where the counter sniper seems surprised by the first sound. That is, he's looked up from his scope as if he's seen something, then the first shot sounds, and then he goes back to his gun and ?maybe gets off some ?misdirected shots. I can't guess which is the correct one.
After seeming to suffer a shock at first, Trump gets his hand to his ear by the sound of the second shot. We have to take into account the delay in neural signalling to the brain, the delay in brain processing, the delay in processing pain to the arm (reaction) and the physical reaction time to move the arm to the ear. I'd think he was responding to the first shot (bullet or none).
One of the videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BJ_TsmQGqg has a chronometer, and did multiple syncs of 2 videos at a time (mostly successfully - in an early one there's a clear delay). It's an odd chronometer in that it's partial seconds (apparently tenths and hundredths) only seem to count to ~24 - not sure what that's about. Many videos are matched together and the sound is different in each one - usually you can tell which of the two the sound relates to.
Anyway, the sound of the first shot is at 18:11:33 which I think is a particularly masonic number (666:11:33). Whoever fired first - the SS or the lone wolf/patsy - may have done so by order to please the number gods. After that there is a shot in the early 18:11:34's and then a slightly quicker shot in the later 18:11:34s. There is a pause of 3-4 seconds and then in the video taking near the patsy-roof one hears five rapid shots at 18:11:38, followed by a sixth that sounds like it comes from a different gun at 18:11:39. And then ten seconds later there is a final shot - a different gun again imv.
The msm videos which were shot from some distance back from the podium have 2 sounds for each shot. I'm no expert at all but I've read that the first sound is the sonic boom from the bullet and the second is the sound arriving from the musket. However in the video I've linked above, the video taken from the patsy shed starting at about 1:02 has the clearest and loudest sound, with very little delay, suggesting that the principal weapon is close to that shed - it's a very punchy sound, particularly the 5 rapid shots. Listen to them all and tell me what you think.
The public have been hurt and this becomes clear in the later matches where people are calling/screaming for medics. I did a little bit of research - there was the fireman who was killed in a shot to the head, another who collected 2 bullets, another only 1 I think. That accounts for four bullets.
I've done quite a lot of work on the blood issue, but haven't found a lot more. Trump seems to miss his maga hat and I think the agent who has it tells him to hold it in his hand because it's bloody. I haven't been able to see the blood on the hat (red?). That hat actually goes on quite a journey between the agents - once handed back to Trump it's dropped in the fist pumps, picked up by the girl in front (why she bends down), and then taken out of her hand by an agent and magically passed back.
If you have the time tell me what you think. I might explore the gun sounds in various vids - I think that's the best clue. I'm not convinced the SS agent on the roof fired in the timeframe of the first 3 shots. He might've been startled each time.
If it was staged, and this is not at all unreasonable to wonder - his apparent best mate who introduced him at the RNC runs wrestling among other fights - obviously staged. So staging is in the blood of both of them. But it does introduce a wide range of complexity re who could've been 'in on it' and how it could've been managed.
Thank you, Madelaine, for taking the time to look into the video, and document your thoughts. I see what you mean, with the sniper and the first shot not matching, from another angle, and yes, the timing of the first shot does seem strange. I agree, he seems to respond to the first shot. I have seen several videos now and am finding it difficult to interpret what is happening with the shots.
Witnessing the lockstep of Covid, I now think anything is possible, and I will probably never know the truth of the detail here. I do find it surreal that Blackrock just happen to be airing a commercial with the alleged shooter in it – what?! – and is Blackrock really that incompetent?! But just like whether or not there was a real virus, a lab leak or something else, the key point to realise is that the ‘virus’ was created for the vaxxine, not the other way around, the salient point here, for me, is that there is something else going on.
While I have backed Trump over the last (at least) five years, across only the last few days I have been persuaded that whatever the details, ultimately the event was staged by the powers that should not be, to usher in Trump as a president that everyone can now get behind. I believe if they really wanted him dead, they would have got it done.
Re "staged"... It's highly likely the event was engineered (but huuge incompetence is possible also). I haven't seen evidence that Trump WASN'T the target of live shots. Other commentators don't think a bullet could be shot to clip an ear, ensuring continuing life.
Re "If they really wanted him dead"... I'll think about that. I don't think anyone in genuine power wants to be found guilty of assassination - perhaps patsy's are harder to find than we think.
None of the perpetrators of the recent worldwide vaxxine genocide have been so far found guilty, despite a world full of evidence. I believe they do what they do, and are getting more brazen, maybe because people are so easily fooled. In watching one commentator after another marvel over the shooting, the 'heroics', the 'miracle' I innately recoil from the instantaneous ‘coming together’ of everyone, from the unfettered adulation gushing from almost every freedom fighter, in the same way I was repulsed by the mob of vaxxine pushers.
Are you sure it's adulation for Trump? I celebrate the possible evidence of a miracle and survival of the better policies for another day.
I got sucked into American politics in 2016 when the little bird landed on Bernie Sander's podium. I got so involved I vowed I wouldn't look at it again. I managed to escape 2020 but here I am, coz 'miracle'.
In 2016, after Sanders was (apparently) cheated out, I decided that if I was American I'd vote for Trump, even though I'm a heritage caring left. Not for Trump (of questionable character), but for all the beautiful people following. They knew what was best, and I trusted them.
I understand Trump quickly settled the question of the "coming together" by halfway through his nomination acceptance speech. I'm waiting to see how he takes on Kamala - not expecting any deference to her diversity status :)
Well, I’m officially neither far-right nor far-left, in Australian politics I’m officially a swinging voter. Having voted at one point or another for both parties. As for American politics, a prudent Australian individual would take notice, because as you say, what happens there, comes here! I am not a “Trumper” but at present he’s the only pick. I like RFK Jr, but in the end he’ll be a disruptive third. Good on him! Oh, for the record, the Labor Party, has by stealth allowed proportionately into Australia similars ‘legal’ immigrate levels as Biden has let ‘slipped’ across the border into the US. It’s a disgrace for us and them.
Indeed, Kennedy is great on many things I value, and very much stronger than Trump on all the toxic products, but without preferential voting... I don't know how much he'll be an alternative for the Democrat voters. I very much hope he can find his way into the Trump administration somewhere useful and powerful.
That's if there was a bullet. This video seems to suggest Trump went down to the three bullets fired from the sniper in the other direction, not the patsy. I am no expert, and would love some input here. https://www.bitchute.com/video/AVkZbQMrZ5iK/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I prefer Trump's policies also...as any remotely sane person would. Unfortunately I don't see a miracle, I see a set up. Immediately the documents case is dropped, a questionable VP is announced, and a random vaxxine conversation is leaked. He recounts that 'there was blood all over my hand', except there wasn't, at all. I don't know what to think, or what the whole truth is, but I'm fairly certain it is not the narrative being enthusiastically sold by Tucker, Candace, Naomi, Megyn, Piers, Shapiro, Brand, and well,...almost everyone, including people who previously hated DT. I have a really bad feeling about this, and hope I'm absolutely wrong.
He's exaggerated about the blood all over his hand, but the photo at 1:01 in this vid certainly shows it - it's shaped like the touch on an ear rim - and if you look in the standard vids, immediately after the touch he wipes his thumb against his finger to clean the blood off. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYZkuishR6c I'm not saying a photo can't be touched up.
Nor saying that he didn't break a fake capsule and find the feel of the substance distasteful. I've put the photo into the article.
I've also put in another photo of his closest agent with a bloodied cloth - I've seen images of the agent wiping his face.
I've been through a few 'it was a set up' vids, and I can't explain everything, but I've come down on the balance of probabilities - watching him flinch - that he was hit.
I'm very glad you're cynical and I'll go through the bitchute in the morning - I'd love to discuss it all too.
So... I've spent a lot of time looking at the video at the link you gave me, and many, many others. I am no expert on guns and recoil. The narrator of the video seemed to suggest that every time the SS gun moved (in that first team) a shot had been fired. If that were the case I'd expect three Very off-target shots (unless the gun had some programmable firing point because it was moving around everywhere.
The narrator's argument relied on the synchronisation of the gun movement and the sound. As that is something that can be readily manipulated in post production I checked a lot of other videos, often side-by-side. I saw another synchronised like that at your link above, and an alternate timing where the counter sniper seems surprised by the first sound. That is, he's looked up from his scope as if he's seen something, then the first shot sounds, and then he goes back to his gun and ?maybe gets off some ?misdirected shots. I can't guess which is the correct one.
After seeming to suffer a shock at first, Trump gets his hand to his ear by the sound of the second shot. We have to take into account the delay in neural signalling to the brain, the delay in brain processing, the delay in processing pain to the arm (reaction) and the physical reaction time to move the arm to the ear. I'd think he was responding to the first shot (bullet or none).
One of the videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BJ_TsmQGqg has a chronometer, and did multiple syncs of 2 videos at a time (mostly successfully - in an early one there's a clear delay). It's an odd chronometer in that it's partial seconds (apparently tenths and hundredths) only seem to count to ~24 - not sure what that's about. Many videos are matched together and the sound is different in each one - usually you can tell which of the two the sound relates to.
Anyway, the sound of the first shot is at 18:11:33 which I think is a particularly masonic number (666:11:33). Whoever fired first - the SS or the lone wolf/patsy - may have done so by order to please the number gods. After that there is a shot in the early 18:11:34's and then a slightly quicker shot in the later 18:11:34s. There is a pause of 3-4 seconds and then in the video taking near the patsy-roof one hears five rapid shots at 18:11:38, followed by a sixth that sounds like it comes from a different gun at 18:11:39. And then ten seconds later there is a final shot - a different gun again imv.
The msm videos which were shot from some distance back from the podium have 2 sounds for each shot. I'm no expert at all but I've read that the first sound is the sonic boom from the bullet and the second is the sound arriving from the musket. However in the video I've linked above, the video taken from the patsy shed starting at about 1:02 has the clearest and loudest sound, with very little delay, suggesting that the principal weapon is close to that shed - it's a very punchy sound, particularly the 5 rapid shots. Listen to them all and tell me what you think.
The public have been hurt and this becomes clear in the later matches where people are calling/screaming for medics. I did a little bit of research - there was the fireman who was killed in a shot to the head, another who collected 2 bullets, another only 1 I think. That accounts for four bullets.
I've done quite a lot of work on the blood issue, but haven't found a lot more. Trump seems to miss his maga hat and I think the agent who has it tells him to hold it in his hand because it's bloody. I haven't been able to see the blood on the hat (red?). That hat actually goes on quite a journey between the agents - once handed back to Trump it's dropped in the fist pumps, picked up by the girl in front (why she bends down), and then taken out of her hand by an agent and magically passed back.
Here's another compilation video that's interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UBS2ds4Ogc
If you have the time tell me what you think. I might explore the gun sounds in various vids - I think that's the best clue. I'm not convinced the SS agent on the roof fired in the timeframe of the first 3 shots. He might've been startled each time.
If it was staged, and this is not at all unreasonable to wonder - his apparent best mate who introduced him at the RNC runs wrestling among other fights - obviously staged. So staging is in the blood of both of them. But it does introduce a wide range of complexity re who could've been 'in on it' and how it could've been managed.
Thank you, Madelaine, for taking the time to look into the video, and document your thoughts. I see what you mean, with the sniper and the first shot not matching, from another angle, and yes, the timing of the first shot does seem strange. I agree, he seems to respond to the first shot. I have seen several videos now and am finding it difficult to interpret what is happening with the shots.
Witnessing the lockstep of Covid, I now think anything is possible, and I will probably never know the truth of the detail here. I do find it surreal that Blackrock just happen to be airing a commercial with the alleged shooter in it – what?! – and is Blackrock really that incompetent?! But just like whether or not there was a real virus, a lab leak or something else, the key point to realise is that the ‘virus’ was created for the vaxxine, not the other way around, the salient point here, for me, is that there is something else going on.
While I have backed Trump over the last (at least) five years, across only the last few days I have been persuaded that whatever the details, ultimately the event was staged by the powers that should not be, to usher in Trump as a president that everyone can now get behind. I believe if they really wanted him dead, they would have got it done.
Re "staged"... It's highly likely the event was engineered (but huuge incompetence is possible also). I haven't seen evidence that Trump WASN'T the target of live shots. Other commentators don't think a bullet could be shot to clip an ear, ensuring continuing life.
Re "If they really wanted him dead"... I'll think about that. I don't think anyone in genuine power wants to be found guilty of assassination - perhaps patsy's are harder to find than we think.
None of the perpetrators of the recent worldwide vaxxine genocide have been so far found guilty, despite a world full of evidence. I believe they do what they do, and are getting more brazen, maybe because people are so easily fooled. In watching one commentator after another marvel over the shooting, the 'heroics', the 'miracle' I innately recoil from the instantaneous ‘coming together’ of everyone, from the unfettered adulation gushing from almost every freedom fighter, in the same way I was repulsed by the mob of vaxxine pushers.
Are you sure it's adulation for Trump? I celebrate the possible evidence of a miracle and survival of the better policies for another day.
I got sucked into American politics in 2016 when the little bird landed on Bernie Sander's podium. I got so involved I vowed I wouldn't look at it again. I managed to escape 2020 but here I am, coz 'miracle'.
In 2016, after Sanders was (apparently) cheated out, I decided that if I was American I'd vote for Trump, even though I'm a heritage caring left. Not for Trump (of questionable character), but for all the beautiful people following. They knew what was best, and I trusted them.
I understand Trump quickly settled the question of the "coming together" by halfway through his nomination acceptance speech. I'm waiting to see how he takes on Kamala - not expecting any deference to her diversity status :)