Given the significant negative consequences for anyone disparaging the Covid 'vaccines' at all levels, it is highly likely the reporting of Covid vaccine injuries is dramatically under-reported. Even when compared to historical reporting of other vaccines - for which the stigma of being 'anti-vax' was nowhere near as potent.
Additionally, the Covid 'vaccines' seem to be 'delivering' their harm for some considerable time after injection, with a concomitant diminishment in the likelihood of connecting, and reporting.
Absolutely, on all those points. When I first saw the 2020/21 stats I was shocked that there was any health care worker reporting at all. I know there's significant under-reporting even in my own family. I haven't had a chance to go carefully through the stats to analyse all the signals that could indicate alternate coding for vaccine injuries. My biggest take on this is that the adverse events are so numerous that even the gagged and discouraged health care workers can't overlook it
Saw your comment on Igor’s stack about this post not getting views. I wonder if there is any new data regarding the covid vax. Haven’t looked at AIHW lately because they haven’t updated anything meaningful. I might trawl through it to see if there is anything new updates of interest. Here’s some old stuff that I found interesting. The more I see the more I think it’s effecting women more than men particularly in the younger age groups but nobody seems that interested in looking at the reasons.
People aren't usually admitted to hospital (when beds are extremely scarce and ambulances are ramping) unless they are very sick - I don't think there'd be a gender bias against men on admission.
The AIHW reports a heavily female cohort of post-vaccine injury (T88.1), however in this case, data to 30 June 2021 (very early in the rollout) is going to be slightly biased towards those who were first offered the shots - the very old population (female preponderance) and health workers (also female preponderance) - but not enough to explain the large differences in hospital admissions.
It's a very big excel list. Search on T88.1, and collect the data by sex.
I haven't collected this data yet, but, to challenge myself, although there there may be a higher rate hospitalisations in the young male age cohort due to the heart issues I don't think it will exceed female hospitalisations - I might be wrong [Edit: I was wrong - see post below] - there were a lot of females with massive bleeding issues, and they also seemed far more affected by neurological conditions. Against that, this data will also contain boosters, and "winter shots" - probably with a small female bias again towards aged and health uptake - but I don't think this will explain a clear sex difference in hospitalisation.
In general, females need more medical care, and not just when they are having babies - they have more working parts :) and medical theory has more difficulty, and less trials with female physiology.
I couldn't resist - looked at the 30 June 2021-2022 data, by sex.
In fact I was wrong on the young cohorts - the males are exceeding the females in hospitalisations, from the 15-19 age group, down - poor boys! It's typical that the baby boys have more reactions to the standard vaccines (x-tail problems, maybe), but not typical in the older boys. (Bearing in mind, typically 5% more males than females are born, and this sex bias continues into the adult age groups).
These are not self reports like VAERS or DAEN, they're hospital separations. The U07.7 diagnosis is put in by a medical professional in a hospital during a visit so I think there is more to it than just reporting bias. There may be a some bias towards women being more likely to seek medical treatment but when the ratio is over 7 in 40-44 y.o. you'd think more questions should have be asked at the time. The data are from the early roll-out in Australia so it might be more skewed towards women because the shots were mandated for health care workers and teachers so they may be over represented. Slightly more women took the shots, it's about 53:47 from memory, but it may have been a bit more skewed early on.
The Australian Cause of Death Statistics are reporting with these U codes, viz
-COVID-19 (U07.1-U07.2)
-Post COVID-19 condition (U09)
-Multi-system inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 (U10)
-COVID-19 vaccines causing adverse effects in therapeutic use (U12)
They don't report T codes - maybe they're only for living people? - haven't investigated.
The AIHW are only reporting with a few of the U codes, some not published (np) and the numbers aren't large - I don't know when they're being used. It's not very coherent, but I haven't studied it.
U00–U49 Provisional assignment of new diseases of uncertain aetiology or emergency use 428
- n.p. 96
- U07 Emergency use of U07 332
- n.p. 122
- U07.5 Emergency use of U07.5 [Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19] 210
Thanks for this information and analysis.
A few thoughts.
Given the significant negative consequences for anyone disparaging the Covid 'vaccines' at all levels, it is highly likely the reporting of Covid vaccine injuries is dramatically under-reported. Even when compared to historical reporting of other vaccines - for which the stigma of being 'anti-vax' was nowhere near as potent.
Additionally, the Covid 'vaccines' seem to be 'delivering' their harm for some considerable time after injection, with a concomitant diminishment in the likelihood of connecting, and reporting.
Absolutely, on all those points. When I first saw the 2020/21 stats I was shocked that there was any health care worker reporting at all. I know there's significant under-reporting even in my own family. I haven't had a chance to go carefully through the stats to analyse all the signals that could indicate alternate coding for vaccine injuries. My biggest take on this is that the adverse events are so numerous that even the gagged and discouraged health care workers can't overlook it
Saw your comment on Igor’s stack about this post not getting views. I wonder if there is any new data regarding the covid vax. Haven’t looked at AIHW lately because they haven’t updated anything meaningful. I might trawl through it to see if there is anything new updates of interest. Here’s some old stuff that I found interesting. The more I see the more I think it’s effecting women more than men particularly in the younger age groups but nobody seems that interested in looking at the reasons.
https://krap.substack.com/p/u077-covid-19-vaccines-causing-adverse/comments
One needs more info on how many men and women actually took the shots.
Then there's the question of whether women more likely to report injuries than men.
Statistics can be fascinating but ultimately very difficult to analyse as so many variables to consider.
There is no difference in uptake-by-sex in Australia that would reveal itself in hospital outcomes, assuming government was accurately reporting uptake. You can find the uptake differences here: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/collections/covid-19-vaccination-rollout-update
These AIHW statistics do report by sex and I published them to 30 June 2021 here;
https://madeleinelove.substack.com/p/vaccine-injury-acknowledged-in-hospital
People aren't usually admitted to hospital (when beds are extremely scarce and ambulances are ramping) unless they are very sick - I don't think there'd be a gender bias against men on admission.
The AIHW reports a heavily female cohort of post-vaccine injury (T88.1), however in this case, data to 30 June 2021 (very early in the rollout) is going to be slightly biased towards those who were first offered the shots - the very old population (female preponderance) and health workers (also female preponderance) - but not enough to explain the large differences in hospital admissions.
The 30 June 2022 data brings in the rest of the vaccinated cohort. I invite you to look at it, here https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/principal-diagnosis-data-cubes/contents/summary
It's a very big excel list. Search on T88.1, and collect the data by sex.
I haven't collected this data yet, but, to challenge myself, although there there may be a higher rate hospitalisations in the young male age cohort due to the heart issues I don't think it will exceed female hospitalisations - I might be wrong [Edit: I was wrong - see post below] - there were a lot of females with massive bleeding issues, and they also seemed far more affected by neurological conditions. Against that, this data will also contain boosters, and "winter shots" - probably with a small female bias again towards aged and health uptake - but I don't think this will explain a clear sex difference in hospitalisation.
In general, females need more medical care, and not just when they are having babies - they have more working parts :) and medical theory has more difficulty, and less trials with female physiology.
I couldn't resist - looked at the 30 June 2021-2022 data, by sex.
In fact I was wrong on the young cohorts - the males are exceeding the females in hospitalisations, from the 15-19 age group, down - poor boys! It's typical that the baby boys have more reactions to the standard vaccines (x-tail problems, maybe), but not typical in the older boys. (Bearing in mind, typically 5% more males than females are born, and this sex bias continues into the adult age groups).
T88.1 Separations (Same Day & Overnight combined)
<1 : M 47, F 37
1-4 : M 17, F 19
5-9 : M 8, F 4
10-14: M 49, F 40
15-19: M 166, F 141
20-24: M 161, F 222
25-29: M 156, F 251
etc...
These are not self reports like VAERS or DAEN, they're hospital separations. The U07.7 diagnosis is put in by a medical professional in a hospital during a visit so I think there is more to it than just reporting bias. There may be a some bias towards women being more likely to seek medical treatment but when the ratio is over 7 in 40-44 y.o. you'd think more questions should have be asked at the time. The data are from the early roll-out in Australia so it might be more skewed towards women because the shots were mandated for health care workers and teachers so they may be over represented. Slightly more women took the shots, it's about 53:47 from memory, but it may have been a bit more skewed early on.
NB: The code in the data graphed above is T88.1 "Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified"
Do you know if they updated the U07.7?
I can't remember where I found the data in my original post.
The ICD-10 2019 codes look like this....
U04 Severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS]
U07 Emergency use of U07
- U07.0 Vaping-related disorder
- U07.1 COVID-19, virus identified
- U07.2 COVID-19, virus not identified
U08 Personal history of COVID-19
U09 Post COVID-19 condition
U10 Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19
U11 Need for immunization against COVID-19
U12 COVID-19 vaccines causing adverse effects in therapeutic use
- U12.9 COVID-19 vaccines causing adverse effects in therapeutic use, unspecified
The Australian Cause of Death Statistics are reporting with these U codes, viz
-COVID-19 (U07.1-U07.2)
-Post COVID-19 condition (U09)
-Multi-system inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 (U10)
-COVID-19 vaccines causing adverse effects in therapeutic use (U12)
They don't report T codes - maybe they're only for living people? - haven't investigated.
The AIHW are only reporting with a few of the U codes, some not published (np) and the numbers aren't large - I don't know when they're being used. It's not very coherent, but I haven't studied it.
U00–U49 Provisional assignment of new diseases of uncertain aetiology or emergency use 428
- n.p. 96
- U07 Emergency use of U07 332
- n.p. 122
- U07.5 Emergency use of U07.5 [Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19] 210
They did previously use:
U07.7 COVID-19 vaccines causing adverse effects in therapeutic use
2020 - 2021 M 633 F 1416 n= 2,049 (I think it was only to June 2021).
I can't find it again, maybe they stopped using it? Maybe, it was "too easy to find" and easily "misinterpreted".
It would have been reported in the same period as your T88.1 data in your old post.
https://madeleinelove.substack.com/p/vaccine-injury-acknowledged-in-hospital
I've got it archived somewhere but I've accumulated heaps of KRAP that I want to go back and have a better look at but never did.